Where it started
A pharma company had a successful injectable on the market as a combination product in a pen. The next step was a broader patient group, which needed a larger dose. A new dose strength needs a regulatory submission in any case. The aim was to keep the pen unchanged, because changing it would trigger a new round of V&V.
The strategic question
A larger dose can be split into two smaller ones. In some markets, doctors are encouraged to do so. If the large dose was priced below two small ones, the product would undercut its own market. Should splitting be prevented in the pen, next to the pen, or outside the device altogether?
What we found
The first step was a shared rule set: what could change in the pen without reopening the device documentation, and what could not. Within those rules, three directions were developed and priced on device complexity, user steps and production cost.
